The AQUILA study included patients with high-risk myeloma as they were defined in 2017 when the study was initiated and the patients were randomized to either observation or to treatment with daratumumab for three years. The primary endpoint of the study was progression to symptomatic myeloma according to the SLIM-CRAB criteria and we were happy to observe that there was a significant improvement in the progression-free survival in favor of daratumumab with a hazard ratio 0...
The AQUILA study included patients with high-risk myeloma as they were defined in 2017 when the study was initiated and the patients were randomized to either observation or to treatment with daratumumab for three years. The primary endpoint of the study was progression to symptomatic myeloma according to the SLIM-CRAB criteria and we were happy to observe that there was a significant improvement in the progression-free survival in favor of daratumumab with a hazard ratio 0.5 indicating that there was a 50% reduction of the probability of progression or death in favor of daratumumab. Furthermore, there was also a trend for an overall survival advantage, which actually was statistically significant in favor of daratumumab treatment. So we believe that it is likely that daratumumab may become a new standard of care for the patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.