Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

EBMT 2025 | Optimizing bridging therapy strategies before CAR T-cell therapy

In this interview, Anna Sureda, MD, PhD, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Duran I Reynals Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, comments on the need for effective and low-toxicity bridging therapies prior to CAR T-cell therapy, emphasizing the importance of individualizing bridging strategies based on patient disease burden, prior treatments, and toxicity profiles. Despite the availability of various bridging therapy approaches, there is a lack of prospective clinical trials to identify the superiority of one bridging therapy over another. This interview took place at the 51st Annual Meeting of the EBMT in Florence, Italy.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So, bridging therapy before CAR-T is one of the big question marks in this specific setting. So we know that patients do better after CAR-T if they go into the CAR T-cell procedure with less tumor burden. So ideally, it would be nice to have really effective and low toxicity bridging strategies to optimize the long-term outcome of patients being treated with CAR-T...

So, bridging therapy before CAR-T is one of the big question marks in this specific setting. So we know that patients do better after CAR-T if they go into the CAR T-cell procedure with less tumor burden. So ideally, it would be nice to have really effective and low toxicity bridging strategies to optimize the long-term outcome of patients being treated with CAR-T. 

After having said that, we don’t have prospective clinical trials that demonstrate the benefit of one bridging strategy over another one and probably we will never have them. So here we need first of all to individualize each patient and take into consideration first of all how much disease on board the patient has, also the treatments that the patient has received before and also the toxicity profile of the treatment that we want to give as a bridging treatment strategy. 

For those patients with localized disease, radiotherapy can be a perfect option because it’s very effective, it’s not very toxic. For those patients with non-localized disease, that by the way represent the vast majority of them, it depends a little bit on what we have available. Sometimes only polychemotherapy is available and we have to go for that. Sometimes we have the possibility to use targeted strategies, for instance, polatuzumab vedotin that has demonstrated to be an interesting bridging approach for patients that go into CAR T-cells. 

And if I have to make a kind of a guess for the future, I think that the use of bispecific monoclonal antibodies that are targeting CD20 and CD3. They are very effective. They usually have not been seen by the patient, at least in the way that we are using CAR-T, and I think that there are some data that indicate that could be a very good bridging strategy.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Honoraria: Takeda, BMS/Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Amgen, Novartis, Gilead Kite, Sanofi, Roche, Alexion; Consultancy: Takeda, BMS/Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Gilead, Sanofi; Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda; Research Support: Takeda, BMS/Celgene; Non-profit organizations: Presidency of the GETH-TC, Presidency of the EBMT.