Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Acute Myeloid Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Silver), and through an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2025 | Maintenance therapy in allografted patients with AML: the MORPHO and AMADEUS trials

Charles Craddock, CBE, FRCP(UK), FRCPath, DPhil, FMedSci, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, discusses the evolving paradigm of maintenance therapy in allografted patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). He highlights the importance of the MORPHO trial (NCT02997202), which demonstrated the benefit of gilteritinib, as well as ongoing investigations into CC-486 (AMADEUS; NCT04173533). This interview took place at the 67th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in Orlando, FL.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I think the pivotal study in this space was the MORPHO trial conducted by the U.S. BMT CTN led by Mark Levis. And that demonstrated in patients with a FLT3 mutation that if they were pre-transplant MRD positive or had peri-transplant MRD positivity, maintenance with gilteritinib significantly improved relapse-free survival. Really important proof of principle that maintenance has a role. So we now have to understand where is the role of maintenance...

I think the pivotal study in this space was the MORPHO trial conducted by the U.S. BMT CTN led by Mark Levis. And that demonstrated in patients with a FLT3 mutation that if they were pre-transplant MRD positive or had peri-transplant MRD positivity, maintenance with gilteritinib significantly improved relapse-free survival. Really important proof of principle that maintenance has a role. So we now have to understand where is the role of maintenance. Firstly, in patients who are FLT3-mutated who don’t have MRD positivity. And interestingly, in MORPHO, there was no survival benefit. In fact, there was just increased toxicity. So I think one could reserve the use of FLT3 inhibitors in that population. And secondly, we’re awaiting the results of studies such as AMADEUS, where we randomized 324 patients to receive post-transplant or related azacitidine CC-486. But I think what we need going forward is well-conducted randomized trials assessing the impact of particular therapies, either pan-leukemic activity agents or particular targeted therapies. The real challenge is to think about the redesign of these studies so that we’re only applying maintenance to patients who have a particular risk of relapse and so I think in that context we should be focusing on patients who are pre-transplant MRD positive or have very adverse genetics. That allows us to refine the design of these studies, make them rather smaller and hopefully more deliverable.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...