The first point to note is that sometimes it is possible to reuse agents, but in different combinations, and we still see some activity. Having said that, one of the crucial tenets of treating triple-class exposed patients is now the availability of T-cell redirectional therapies. So on that basis, since our talk was on the non-T-cell therapies, one can choose combinations that may include elements of classes that they’ve been exposed to before, but then combined with other classes...
The first point to note is that sometimes it is possible to reuse agents, but in different combinations, and we still see some activity. Having said that, one of the crucial tenets of treating triple-class exposed patients is now the availability of T-cell redirectional therapies. So on that basis, since our talk was on the non-T-cell therapies, one can choose combinations that may include elements of classes that they’ve been exposed to before, but then combined with other classes. So, for instance, it is possible to use a carfilzomib combination in someone who’s been refractory to bortezomib, for instance, and then combine it with the alternative anti-CD38 antibody, combine it with pomalidomide. Of course, there’s now data on the use of belantamab, and from the DREAMM-8 trial, there were approximately 25% anti-CD38 refractory patients, which gives us randomized trial data to make that choice. And even though they’re mainly from Phase I studies and Phase I/II studies in terms of the CELMoDs, I think there’s a lot of hope that they will also help in combinations currently with iberdomide with daratumumab or mezigdomide with carfilzomib, that they will be helpful in triple-class exposed patients.