This is a very interesting analysis that’s called the skew twist. That’s sort of an acronym that we use. And it’s when you look at these randomized studies and there is a survival benefit of one drug versus the other, the question is how much is that just because they leave more or less than the other arm driven by time that you spend with a lot of side effects in the hospital anyway or how much of that survival benefit could be because of rescue after a relapse because all of that is survival but is invaluable...
This is a very interesting analysis that’s called the skew twist. That’s sort of an acronym that we use. And it’s when you look at these randomized studies and there is a survival benefit of one drug versus the other, the question is how much is that just because they leave more or less than the other arm driven by time that you spend with a lot of side effects in the hospital anyway or how much of that survival benefit could be because of rescue after a relapse because all of that is survival but is invaluable. So this analysis focuses on the time, the valuable time, the time that the patient has without side effects, and the time that the patient has without need for additional therapies and other things. So when you look at that valuable time, we see that there’s particular benefits for quizartinib and mostly driven by the higher rate of responses and longer remission duration and so on. It’s not so much from the safety point of view that there are actually some areas where there’s a little bit more side effects, but because of the high rate of response and duration of remission and all of that, that valuable time becomes significantly better. So that emphasizes the value of the quizartinib combination with standard chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy alone as something that really benefits the patients.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.