Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

Oxford Myeloma Workshop 2025 | Challenging the current paradigm of sequencing in multiple myeloma

In this video, Karthik Ramasamy, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK, discusses sequencing in multiple myeloma (MM) and comments on how the paradigm of treating patients with an immunomodulatory drug plus a second-generation proteasome inhibitor at relapse is being challenged by trials showing significant benefits of switching to BCMA-targeted therapies. Dr Ramasamy notes that further data are needed to determine whether switching classes or maintaining the same drug class is beneficial for specific patient populations. This interview took place at the 5th Oxford Myeloma Workshop in Oxford, UK.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

In myeloma, we used to have three big drug classes: proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and then CD38 antibodies. We now have new targets, and they can be targeted by new therapies. So philosophically, we were thinking about, well, we’ll start with an immunomodulatory drug plus a proteasome inhibitor, and then go to a second-generation proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug and we did have clinical benefits...

In myeloma, we used to have three big drug classes: proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and then CD38 antibodies. We now have new targets, and they can be targeted by new therapies. So philosophically, we were thinking about, well, we’ll start with an immunomodulatory drug plus a proteasome inhibitor, and then go to a second-generation proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug and we did have clinical benefits. They’re all licensed. But the key challenge to this paradigm is because we now have trials showing that if you move from patients who have been exposed to proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs to, say, a BCMA-targeted therapy, patients are clearly getting a significant benefit in some of the trials that have come through. So this is starting to challenge the paradigm of moving from first-generation to second-generation immunomodulatory drug and proteasome-based combination to completely changing drug class. We need further data. There may be patients who may be more beneficial by switching classes. There may be patients we feel that who could benefit from a second-generation approach. But in time with further data I think we’ll be clearer about whether switching class or maintaining the same drug class is beneficial and if so for which sort of patients.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Menarini Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Recordati rare Disease: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.