Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

Oxford Myeloma Workshop 2025 | The uncertainties relating to sequencing in myeloma and optimizing future approaches

In this video, Paul Richardson, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, briefly comments on the challenges and uncertainties relating to the sequencing of therapies in multiple myeloma (MM), highlighting the need to better understand how novel treatment options should be selected between when treating patients at relapse. Dr Richardson emphasizes the importance of considering safety and immune exhaustion when selecting treatment strategies and suggests that a more nuanced approach may be necessary to optimize patient outcomes. This interview took place at the 5th Oxford Myeloma Workshop in Oxford, UK.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

Well, I think the sequencing becomes all the more challenging because, of course, we’re using a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulator, steroids, and the CD38 antibody first. And should that treatment platform fail a patient, the question then becomes, what do you do? 

So, I think with BCMA-targeted approaches, we now have an obvious, very exciting next step...

Well, I think the sequencing becomes all the more challenging because, of course, we’re using a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulator, steroids, and the CD38 antibody first. And should that treatment platform fail a patient, the question then becomes, what do you do? 

So, I think with BCMA-targeted approaches, we now have an obvious, very exciting next step. Then we have beyond BCMA, even newer targets that are equally exciting. So the obvious place is the bispecifics, the CAR-Ts, and to look at these immune therapies. But what I also wanted to explain to everyone today was the excitement around other approaches like antibody drug conjugates, in particular, belantamab mafodotin. The emerging roles of these new very exciting oral agents, the so-called CELMoDs, which include iberdomide, but of course in the relapse setting we have now mezigdomide. And then to speak to other novel small molecules which are very important we think in this setting. 

So sequencing really matters but I think that we’re recognizing that with immune therapies they’re very effective, miraculous in some circumstances, but immune exhaustion and safety are becoming much more important considerations as we better understand how to use the immunotherapy tools we now have and so that’s bringing to the fore how you know going from one immune treatment to another may not be the wiser strategy, that going from one immune platform, bringing in other agents and then moving to an immune therapy later may become very important.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Research Funding.