Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | An analysis of Myeloma XI investigating lenalidomide maintenance in transplant-ineligible myeloma

Charlotte Pawlyn, BA, MBBChir, MRCP, PhD, FRCPath, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, discusses an analysis of the Myeloma XI trial (NCT01554852) investigating lenalidomide maintenance in patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. The analysis found significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to patients who received observation after induction therapy. Dr Pawlyn suggests that the optimal duration of lenalidomide maintenance is around the two-year mark, although a randomized stopping study is needed to confirm this. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

I presented an updated analysis of the outcome of the randomization within the Myeloma XI trial that for transplant-ineligible patients, randomized patients between maintenance with lenalidomide, which was planned to continue to disease progression, or observation after they’d received their initial induction therapy. What we saw was that the lenalidomide maintenance was associated with a significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients, and this seemed to be very consistent across patient subgroups...

I presented an updated analysis of the outcome of the randomization within the Myeloma XI trial that for transplant-ineligible patients, randomized patients between maintenance with lenalidomide, which was planned to continue to disease progression, or observation after they’d received their initial induction therapy. What we saw was that the lenalidomide maintenance was associated with a significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients, and this seemed to be very consistent across patient subgroups. We couldn’t demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival. The overall survival seemed similar between the two arms, those patients who received lenalidomide and those patients who were observed. What we did in the analysis that I presented here was to look at whether we could determine how long patients should stay on lenalidomide maintenance. It’s always a discussion we have with patients, do they really need to continue on treatment if they’re responding well, or could they perhaps have a break from treatment? Our study wasn’t specifically designed to answer this question. For that, you need a randomized stopping study to compare what would happen in the event of stopping maintenance after starting. But what we were able to do was do a cut-point analysis of the data we have to try and look at all those patients who hadn’t progressed yet at different time points and see what the outcomes were compared to patients who were having lenalidomide at that time and patients who were still being observed at that time. What we see is a significant benefit in terms of progression-free survival for those patients beyond at least two years of therapy, but as you get further on, it’s harder to demonstrate that benefit. And so for me, this really suggests that if we were to look at these randomized approaches to really answering this question in detail, it would be about the two-year mark in transplant-ineligible patients that I would think would be the right place to do that.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Menarini Stemline: Honoraria; iTEOS Therapeutics: Honoraria.