Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Multiple Myeloma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Gold) and Legend Biotech (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

IMS 2025 | MRI response and its correlation with MRD negativity after induction in NDMM: the GMMG-HD7 trial

Marina Hajiyianni, MD, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, discusses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) response and its correlation with measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity after induction in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), based on results from the GMMG-HD7 trial (NCT03617731). Findings suggest that whole-body MRI combined with MRD status may be an important tool for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making. This interview took place at the 22nd International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting in Toronto, Canada.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So minimal residual disease assessed in the bone marrow is currently the gold standard when it comes to assessing the depth of treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma, but as we know, myeloma can be a very heterogeneous disease, so with MRD, we just have one assessment of one sample of one body site. So in the GMMG-HD7 imaging sub-study, we conducted whole-body MRI scans at baseline and after induction, as well as MRD assessing the bone marrow by next-generation flow cytometry after induction...

So minimal residual disease assessed in the bone marrow is currently the gold standard when it comes to assessing the depth of treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma, but as we know, myeloma can be a very heterogeneous disease, so with MRD, we just have one assessment of one sample of one body site. So in the GMMG-HD7 imaging sub-study, we conducted whole-body MRI scans at baseline and after induction, as well as MRD assessing the bone marrow by next-generation flow cytometry after induction. We included 83 patients in this sub-study, and the MRI assessments were done according to the MY RADS protocol. This is a standardized and structured reporting system for whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma, and it scores diffuse infiltration, the size and the number of focal lesions, as well as the presence and absence of extramedullary disease. What we observed was that patients with lower scores of diffuse infiltration after induction were much more likely to achieve MRD negativity. And what I found very interesting was that the MRI scores at baseline alone weren’t predictive of MRD status. But if you see this in a dynamic context, so if you take into account if the patients are decreasing MRI scores, then the correlation became significant. So patients who had a decrease in their MRI scores achieved MRD negativity much more often. And in this context, baseline scores also become important because the group with the patients who had lower MRI scores at baseline as well as a reduction in their scores were the group with the highest possibility of achieving MRD negativity. So I think MRI, a whole-body MRI combined with MRD status, would be a very important tool in the next years for risk stratification and decision-making when it comes to therapy in multiple myeloma.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Travel support from IMS.