So, these recommendations for robust immunogenetic analysis exist thanks to the dedicated efforts by ERIC covering all the phases from the pre-analytical and analytical to the post-analytical pertaining to the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the findings. This is what we’re going to discuss during the workshop in Barcelona. Lately, in 2022, we have updated these recommendations regarding different parts of the analytical procedure...
So, these recommendations for robust immunogenetic analysis exist thanks to the dedicated efforts by ERIC covering all the phases from the pre-analytical and analytical to the post-analytical pertaining to the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the findings. This is what we’re going to discuss during the workshop in Barcelona. Lately, in 2022, we have updated these recommendations regarding different parts of the analytical procedure. For example, the methodology, we recommend that the primers and the sequencing method and the bioinformatics tools that have been used for somatic hypermutation status assessment, they are all reported in the lab report. Also regarding factionality, for example, the somatic hypermutation status should be determined only for the productive rearrangements, and if the rearrangement is unproductive, then we should mention the reasons for that. Also another update is that currently there is another feature in the IMGT analysis tool, we can define the subsets, especially subsets 2 and 8, the two aggressive subsets, through this tool.