Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Channel is supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), AbbVie (Platinum), Johnson & Johnson (Gold), BeOne Medicines (Silver) and Lilly (Silver).

VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform. Supporters, including channel supporters, have no influence over the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given to support the channel.

Share this video  

ESH CLL 2026 | Treatment sequencing for patients with CLL who relapse after covalent BTKi

Jennifer Brown, MD, PhD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, discusses treatment sequencing for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who relapse after covalent BTK inhibitors (BTKi), highlighting venetoclax-based therapy and non-covalent BTKi as key options while noting that the optimal sequence remains uncertain. This interview took place at the ESH CLL 2026 congress in Stockholm, Sweden.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So patients who have disease relapsing after covalent BTK inhibitors have two primary options, venetoclax-based option or now a non-covalent BTK inhibitor option. I think we have more and stronger data for the venetoclax-based option, but certainly depending on patient preference or circumstances, and especially in older patients or those with more comorbidities, continuing with another BTK inhibitor may be easier...

So patients who have disease relapsing after covalent BTK inhibitors have two primary options, venetoclax-based option or now a non-covalent BTK inhibitor option. I think we have more and stronger data for the venetoclax-based option, but certainly depending on patient preference or circumstances, and especially in older patients or those with more comorbidities, continuing with another BTK inhibitor may be easier. We certainly don’t know for sure if there is a preferred sequence at present. I would say, though, that if there are BTK inhibitor mutations that have come out after the covalent BTK inhibitors, giving patients a break with venetoclax may potentially change that clonal architecture and give them a chance to get a longer benefit later from the non-covalent, but that’s speculative at present. Right now, I don’t think the non-covalent BTKIs really change the sequencing algorithm. We have such long, mature data with the covalent BTKIs that I think people should still choose those first for their CLL patients. But the emerging data with pirtobrutinib do look interesting, and we’ll have to see what really comes out of that data in terms of the resistance mechanisms for pirtobrutinib.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...