After frontline treatment, we know that near 40% of patients have a relapse. We need to focus on higher-risk patients that are those with a high IPI, or those patients that, for example, after four cycles have a positive PET interim. That group of patients will need a rescue in second line, and in second line currently the paradigm of treatment has changed. So we need to focus on those patients that have an early relapse and early relapse is considered those patients that have a relapse during the 12 first months after the induction treatment...
After frontline treatment, we know that near 40% of patients have a relapse. We need to focus on higher-risk patients that are those with a high IPI, or those patients that, for example, after four cycles have a positive PET interim. That group of patients will need a rescue in second line, and in second line currently the paradigm of treatment has changed. So we need to focus on those patients that have an early relapse and early relapse is considered those patients that have a relapse during the 12 first months after the induction treatment. And currently the standard of care is CAR-T in the countries where CAR-T is available. And we need to think about if the patient is or not candidate to CAR T-cell therapy. For those patients that are not candidates, we have another combination with antibodies that could be polatuzumab and tafasitamab. And then we have the challenge of the late relapses that are still treated with autologous transplant.