So in my session I spoke about the landscape of conditioning regimens in the United States. The main factor is that really the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis has changed the impact of the conditioning regimens and what we use in the United States. For example, the use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens like Fludara is increasing, while the use of other regimens like busulfan and cyclophosphamide is definitely less used than before because of the use of PTCy as a GVHD prophylaxis...
So in my session I spoke about the landscape of conditioning regimens in the United States. The main factor is that really the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis has changed the impact of the conditioning regimens and what we use in the United States. For example, the use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens like Fludara is increasing, while the use of other regimens like busulfan and cyclophosphamide is definitely less used than before because of the use of PTCy as a GVHD prophylaxis. The main takeaways of my session were definitely that the landscape has changed and that has really opened the options for different stem cell sources. As I showed in my session, the number of mismatched unrelated transplants has increased over the years and that is definitely showing the impact that PTCy has had on transplant activity in the United States, especially for patients with AML and MDS.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.