I will basically refer to the Italian situation, which I know quite well. We have the opportunity to use pirtobrutinib on a main patient program, which has been made available over the last two years and this is mainly used in double refractory patients. These patient will be out of options and pirtobrutinib was an effective drug which was studied in the BRUIN studies in the double refractory patient...
I will basically refer to the Italian situation, which I know quite well. We have the opportunity to use pirtobrutinib on a main patient program, which has been made available over the last two years and this is mainly used in double refractory patients. These patient will be out of options and pirtobrutinib was an effective drug which was studied in the BRUIN studies in the double refractory patient.
We will be able soon after EMA approval to use pirtobrutinib in the relapsed refractory setting after failure of ibrutinib. This follows the Phase III trial that compared pirtobrutinib in this setting of patients against a comparator that included bendamustine-rituximab or idelalisib-rituximab. The excellent median 29 months time to next treatment make pirtobrutinib a viable option for patients who lost their response to ibrutinib. And I think that some patients with relapsed/refractory CLL after ibrutinib will be offered this opportunity in the near future in our country.
We also have an established collaboration within the GIMEMA group, the centers participating to the meetings, exchange information on experimental trials, so that every patient seen in Italy with double refractory or triple refractory CLL can be referred to centers that are able to offer these patients BTK degraders or bispecific monoclonal antibodies so that every Italian patient which would be out of options based on what the national health system is offering can be referred to specialized centers for salvage therapy.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.