Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Lymphoma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), BMS (Gold), Johnson & Johnson (Gold), Takeda (Silver) and Galapagos (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Real-world outcomes of treatment with bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies for R/R LBCL

Taylor Brooks, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, comments on the real-world outcomes of bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Dr Brooks highlights a study that found that 53% of patients achieved a response to epcoritamab or glofitamab, with 26% achieving a complete response, and that the duration of responses were encouragingly maintained over time. However, the progression-free and overall survival with these agents was relatively short, and toxicities included cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies have emerged as a promising option for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. There has been increasing interest in determining the real-world outcomes for these agents. So our study was a multi-institutional retrospective cohort from over 20 different centers in the United States that analyzed the outcomes of patients in this population treated with these agents as part of the standard of care...

Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies have emerged as a promising option for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. There has been increasing interest in determining the real-world outcomes for these agents. So our study was a multi-institutional retrospective cohort from over 20 different centers in the United States that analyzed the outcomes of patients in this population treated with these agents as part of the standard of care. So we were able to ascertain 208 patients between the beginning of 2023 to October of this year that were treated with either epcoritamab or glofitamab as part of standard of care for relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma. The median age of our population was about 68 years and on average patients treated with epcoritamab were significantly older by about five years compared to those treated with glofitamab. Most of the patients in our population had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified but we did have a significant fraction of individuals who had high-grade B-cell lymphoma or double-hit lymphoma which was about 18% of our whole population. Patients generally had more comorbidities compared to individuals that were treated with these agents in registrational trials. And in fact, about 70% of our population would have been excluded based on the exclusion criteria that are available from those studies. The overall response rates to the agents in our entire cohort was about 53%, with about 26% achieving a complete response and about 27% achieving a partial response. We found that for the responders, the duration of responses were encouragingly maintained over time, though the progression-free and overall survival with either of these agents was relatively short, that is in keeping with the multiply refractory nature of the treatments that these patients have received. Toxicities were the highest with cytokine release syndrome, with overall in the cohort that occurred in about 50 percent or so. Most events were grade one to grade two but we did see a handful of patients around three that had grade five events due to cytokine release syndrome. ICANS was even less common, but there was one grade five event that was reported with this toxicity. So overall, these agents are a promising option for the treatment of patients who have otherwise very difficult to treat disease and we found that overall, like many real-world studies, the population that we included had more comorbidities and potentially influenced the outcomes based on those findings.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...