Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Acute Myeloid Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Silver), and through an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Influence of AML differentiation state on outcomes of patients treated with frontline HMA + ven

Curtis Lachowiez, MD, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, discusses the influence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) differentiation state in the risk stratification of patients treated with frontline therapy consisting of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) + venetoclax (ven). Dr Lachowiez highlights that patients with monocytic AML have a lower response rate and increased mortality than those with non-monocytic AML but notes that specific mutations, such as NPM1, can confer a favorable prognosis. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

Certainly, yeah. So this was an exciting collaboration between several different centers in the United States as well as 12 institutions across France where we were able to combine a cohort of patients of 450 patients to really understand what the influence of monocytic differentiation is in AML in addition to underlying genetics which are known to be, you know, very well known to be prognostic at the time of diagnosis following HMA-Ven therapy...

Certainly, yeah. So this was an exciting collaboration between several different centers in the United States as well as 12 institutions across France where we were able to combine a cohort of patients of 450 patients to really understand what the influence of monocytic differentiation is in AML in addition to underlying genetics which are known to be, you know, very well known to be prognostic at the time of diagnosis following HMA-Ven therapy. And what we discovered is that patients with monocytic AML are enriched for common mutations in signaling pathways, so NRAS mutations, KRAS mutations, but also mutations in NPM1, which confer increased resistance to venetoclax-based therapy and a favorable prognosis, as well as KMT2A rearrangements. 

When we evaluated responses, we saw that responses were lower in patients with monocytic AML at 59% versus about 70 to 71% in those that were considered non-monocytic. Patients with monocytic AML also had increased rates of 30-day mortality at 11% versus 6% in the non-monocytic subgroup. And this translated to a significant survival difference. 

I think what was important though is, we went on and performed a multivariate analysis that adjusted for common mutations found in monocytic and non-monocytic AML, as well as mutations that have been shown to be prognostic in the context of HMA-Ven therapies, mutations such as IDH1, IDH2, TP53, NPM1, NRAS, KRAS, FLT3 ITD, for instance. And we included transplant in the analysis as well, as that’s a treatment modality that really affects long-term survival. What we found was that within this context, if patients were NPM1 wild type and had monocytic AML, they were more likely to have inferior overall survival. 

And so I think from this analysis, what this shows us is that there’s still room for improvement in understanding who the patients are that will or won’t respond well to HMA-Ven therapy in the frontline setting. And it appears that monocytic AML, irrespective of some of these mutations, may be one of those subgroups. 

Now, the one caveat there is that patients that were NPM1-mutated and had monocytic differentiation actually fared quite well. And so this being a very Ven-sensitive mutation may be a genetic subgroup where AML differentiation state is less impactful in the setting of prognostication.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Syndax: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; COTA Healthcare: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.