Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Acute Myeloid Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Silver), and through an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Venetoclax plus azacitidine for newly diagnosed younger AML

Daniel Pollyea, MD, MS, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, comments on the efficacy of venetoclax plus azacitidine in younger, fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). He highlights the potential for this lower-intensity regimen to be a more effective therapy for certain patients who may not be suitable for intensive induction chemotherapy. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI generated)

So with the venetoclax plus azacitidine regimen in younger fit AML patients newly diagnosed, the intention was really to give them this regimen that was officially designed for older unfit patients on the logic that there are certain patients for whom this is a more effective therapy regardless of their fitness for intensive induction chemotherapy. And so this is the product of several years of work...

So with the venetoclax plus azacitidine regimen in younger fit AML patients newly diagnosed, the intention was really to give them this regimen that was officially designed for older unfit patients on the logic that there are certain patients for whom this is a more effective therapy regardless of their fitness for intensive induction chemotherapy. And so this is the product of several years of work. This clinical trial has been going on for quite a while and we enrolled 36 patients to receive this lower-intensity regimen and these are patients that would have been eligible for receiving intensive induction chemotherapy but opted not to do that because their disease biology suggested they might have a better response to the venetoclax-based regimen. And so we’re very happy with the results. We’re seeing high response rates in this population with a very good long-term overall survival where most of the patients are intended to go to a transplant after this therapy. So I think the hope is that this is proof that even patients who might be eligible for intensive induction chemotherapy might be better off getting a venetoclax-based regimen and that’s you know what we’re going to discuss in the session.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Syros: Honoraria; Syndax: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Aptevo: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sumitomo: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Rigel: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; MEI: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Qihan: Honoraria; Seres: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; LINK: Honoraria; Adicet: Honoraria; Medivir: Honoraria; Hibercell: Honoraria; Oncoverity: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria; Ryvu: Honoraria.