Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Non-Malignant Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Agios (Gold). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

IPIG 2025 | Post hoc analysis of the APPLY-PNH trial: the effect of iptacopan on hematological parameters in PNH

In this interview, Austin Kulasekararaj, MBBS, MD, MRCP, FRCPath, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, briefly discusses the findings of the post hoc analysis of the APPLY-PNH (NCT04558918) trial, which assessed the effect of oral iptacopan monotherapy on hematological parameters in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) who had previously received C5 inhibitor treatment. This interview took place at the 2nd International PNH Interest Group (IPIG) Conference in Paris, France.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So as we all know, iptacopan has been presented in multiple sessions both in APPLY and APPOINT PNH trials, i.e. looking at patients who either had previous treatment with C5 inhibitors, i.e. the APPLY-PNH trial or APPOINT where patients were treated upfront with iptacopan. So what we did in this post-hoc analysis in APPLY was to look at, more than the primary and secondary endpoints we reported in the trial, to see what category patients belong to from a hematological response as per the EBMT criteria reported in Frontiers by Antonio Risitano...

So as we all know, iptacopan has been presented in multiple sessions both in APPLY and APPOINT PNH trials, i.e. looking at patients who either had previous treatment with C5 inhibitors, i.e. the APPLY-PNH trial or APPOINT where patients were treated upfront with iptacopan. So what we did in this post-hoc analysis in APPLY was to look at, more than the primary and secondary endpoints we reported in the trial, to see what category patients belong to from a hematological response as per the EBMT criteria reported in Frontiers by Antonio Risitano. And we were quite pleased to see that similar to the primary and secondary endpoint with improvement in hemoglobin and also proportion of patients avoiding transfusions and achieving a hemoglobin more than 12, we had a significant proportion of patients changing from their baseline response which was not optimal to a very good optimal response including complete and good responses, reiterating the fact that this response criteria does hold true in the era of proximal inhibition as well.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Research support (to institution): Celgene/BMS, Novartis; Consultant: Samsung, Novo Nordisk, Alexion/AstraZeneca, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Silence Therapeutics, AdaRx, Ono Pharma; Speaker’s fees: Alexion/AstraZeneca, Amgen, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, 
Ra Pharmaceuticals/UCB, Roche, Sobi, Janssen; Scientific advisory board/data
monitoring committee: Alexion/Astra Zeneca, Apellis, Amgen, Agios, BioCryst, Celgene/BMS, Geron, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sobi, Janssen, Samsung.