Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), AbbVie (Platinum), BeOne Medicines (Silver) and Lilly (Silver). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | An analysis of QoL outcomes for patients with early-stage CLL treated with ibrutinib in CLL12

Ellinor Goergen, MD, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany, comments on an analysis of quality of life (QoL) outcomes for patients with early-stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with ibrutinib in the CLL12 trial (NCT02863718). She reports that ibrutinib showed a shorter time to improvement in physical functioning and a shorter time to deterioration of bruising compared to placebo, indicating that ibrutinib did not have any major impacts on QoL. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

So I will be presenting the quality of life abstract in the CLL12. So what we did there is look at the quality of life in the treatment-naïve asymptomatic CLL patients, which is one of the most interesting aspects of the study for us because the overall survival was not, there was no difference in the CLL12 study. So for us it was even more important to look at the quality of life of the patients...

So I will be presenting the quality of life abstract in the CLL12. So what we did there is look at the quality of life in the treatment-naïve asymptomatic CLL patients, which is one of the most interesting aspects of the study for us because the overall survival was not, there was no difference in the CLL12 study. So for us it was even more important to look at the quality of life of the patients. What we did see interestingly, so we checked regularly through the questionnaires, the validated questionnaires of the EORTC. The patients gave us about 90% of the patients sent a questionnaire back. And we did see that in terms of physical functioning and global health score, we did not see any differences in the baseline values. But interestingly, the patients that were treated with ibrutinib compared to the placebo patients, they did have a shorter time to improvement in the physical functioning as well as a shorter time to deterioration in the bruising, so like the ibrutinib-associated toxicity overall. So in conclusion we did not see major impacts of ibrutinib on the quality of life of the asymptomatic treatment-naive patients. But also we did not see a negative impact of ibrutinib which is very interesting except for the physical functioning which was better in ibrutinib and the shorter time to deterioration for bruising in ibrutinib.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria.