So we’re already seeing this management or this grading system implemented both in registries and also in clinical trials, which will help comparability of CAR T-cell related hematological toxicity across diseases, across CAR T-cell products. So we think that that’s a real advance because it allows us to evaluate safety signals with one CAR product versus another...
So we’re already seeing this management or this grading system implemented both in registries and also in clinical trials, which will help comparability of CAR T-cell related hematological toxicity across diseases, across CAR T-cell products. So we think that that’s a real advance because it allows us to evaluate safety signals with one CAR product versus another.
In terms of management, we’ve made recommendations for severity-derived management recommendations, and these now allow us to basically say, if you have grade 1 toxicity, do this. If you have grade 3 toxicity, do this. I think that’s an advance because it allows us to standardize management. And with other CAR T-cell toxicities such as CRS, such as ICANS, we’ve seen that this definition of severity grades and then the development of severity-based treatment recommendations really set the stage for reducing the overall toxicity burden. And that’s our hope, that we can make these similar gains also for hematologic toxicity.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.