So, allogeneic transplant in B-cell lymphomas, historically, as you mentioned, has had an important role for the care of patients. I don’t think it’s entirely excluded, but any time we get to expose patients to less toxicity, the better. I think that with CAR-T, not only in the relapsed/refractory setting, but hopefully as we are able to identify more activity in earlier lines of therapy, we can spare most patients from going to allogeneic transplant...
So, allogeneic transplant in B-cell lymphomas, historically, as you mentioned, has had an important role for the care of patients. I don’t think it’s entirely excluded, but any time we get to expose patients to less toxicity, the better. I think that with CAR-T, not only in the relapsed/refractory setting, but hopefully as we are able to identify more activity in earlier lines of therapy, we can spare most patients from going to allogeneic transplant. I will say that in those that have relapsed after a CAR-T that are otherwise young and good candidates for allo-transplant, that it is still a helpful strategy. But obviously it’s a known toxicity. You know, certainly the upfront morbidity and mortality that diminishes its role. So I think that hopefully we continue to get better still are some patients that aren’t fully met, you know, in terms of the outcomes with CAR-T, hopefully we can improve that with additional CAR products, combination strategies and continue to make the intensive therapies less and less needed.