Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Acute Myeloid Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Silver), and through an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Results from the QuANTUM-First trial and comparisons with the RATIFY trial

Harry Erba, MD, PhD, Duke University, Durham, NC, comments on the results of the Phase III QuANTUM-First trial (NCT02668653), highlighting the improved overall survival associated with the addition of quizartinib to standard chemotherapy in patients with FLT3-ITD-positive newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Dr Erba compares findings with the RATIFY trial (NCT00651261) that assessed midostaurin, suggesting that quizartinib may be a better choice as its benefit is seen even without transplantation. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

The Phase III QuANTUM-First trial was an international randomized Phase III study for adults up to the age of 75 with FLT3 ITD mutated AML that were previously untreated. They were randomized between standard 7 and 3 chemotherapy with quizartinib or placebo for two weeks in sequence after the chemotherapy. If they achieved a CR or CRi, they could go on and receive quizartinib or placebo for two weeks after high-dose [inaudible] consolidation...

The Phase III QuANTUM-First trial was an international randomized Phase III study for adults up to the age of 75 with FLT3 ITD mutated AML that were previously untreated. They were randomized between standard 7 and 3 chemotherapy with quizartinib or placebo for two weeks in sequence after the chemotherapy. If they achieved a CR or CRi, they could go on and receive quizartinib or placebo for two weeks after high-dose [inaudible] consolidation. Transplant was allowed at any time. And then at the end of consolidation or following allogeneic transplant, patients could then go on to receive up to 36 28-day cycles of quizartinib or placebo as maintenance, 144 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival, and that was achieved showing a statistically significant benefit for the addition of quizartinib with a 22% reduction in the risk of death. Interesting sidelight about that is that in the RATIFY trial with midostaurin, it was the exact same 22% reduction in the risk of death, leaving us to compare the appropriate population from the RATIFY and the appropriate population from the QuANTUM-First. So these two separate studies. But if you look at patients that are less than the age of 60 and only with a FLT3-ITD mutation, I think the evidence suggests that quizartinib would be a better choice for those patients. I think what really drives my decision making about quizartinib for those patients is that the benefit of quizartinib was seen in patients who did and did not get an allo transplant in first remission. If you remember from the RATIFY trial, the only patients that seemed to have a benefit in terms of survival were those who received the midostaurin and then went on to a transplant. Not true with quizartinib. It was seen in both groups of patients.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Immunogen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; Jazz: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Chair, Myeloid Neoplasms Repository Study., Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; Schrodinger: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; Oryzon: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Chair, Independent Review Committee for VIALE A and VIALE C, Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; Sumitomo Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Steering Committee member, Research Funding; PTE: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenics: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Chair, Myeloid Neoplasms Repository Study., Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Syros: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; Trillium: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board/Consultant; ALX Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Taiho Oncology: Research Funding.