Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), AbbVie (Platinum), BeOne Medicines (Silver) and Lilly (Silver). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

The Community Focus Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

iwCLL 2025 | Updates to the CLL treatment guidelines in the UK: continuous and fixed-duration therapy options

Nicolas Martinez-Calle, MD, PhD, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK, discusses the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the United Kingdom, stating that new treatment guidelines will be published in due course. Dr Martinez-Calle outlines the treatment options available for patients in this country, highlighting that physicians can choose between several continuous and fixed-duration therapies. He notes the increasing shift towards the use of fixed-duration therapy, driven by the benefits of treatment-free periods and the financial advantages for the healthcare system. This interview took place at the biennial International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) 2025 in Krakow, Poland.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So this is a very timely question because we are about to publish the new UK CLL treatment guidelines, which have been updated following the update of European, American, and German guidelines in light of new treatments available. So our guideline are going to go and recommend treatments based on your choice of therapy, where it will be fixed duration or continuous therapy...

So this is a very timely question because we are about to publish the new UK CLL treatment guidelines, which have been updated following the update of European, American, and German guidelines in light of new treatments available. So our guideline are going to go and recommend treatments based on your choice of therapy, where it will be fixed duration or continuous therapy. So for continuous therapy we’ve got in the UK the alternatives of acalabrutinib or zanubrutinib, and for the fixed duration alternative we currently have ibrutinib and venetoclax, and venetoclax and obinutuzumab as kind of more standard or kind of established approaches. And we recently have a marketing authorization for acalabrutinib and venetoclax, which is likely going to come into play within the next few months. So we got three different fixed-duration alternatives for our CLL patients now, and we’ve got a good task ahead of trying to identify which patient suits best each of these three approaches based on the results of the trial, the population, there’s slightly differences of the studies in terms of the proportion of high-risk patients that were included and age and comorbidities, etc. 

So it will be interesting to see how we manage to place each of these three alternatives into the sort of the spectrum of therapy, but I think the direction of travel overall is moving towards fixed-duration therapy. I think patients are starting to value more and more the benefits of the treatment-free period. And when you are talking with patients before they start therapy and you give them a good explanation of what the treatments are, in my experience more and more patients are finding it beneficial to have these treatment-free periods in which they have very little or essentially no side effects, and they’re going back to their normal life after therapy. So I think that’s going to be the direction of travel. Also because it’s beneficial for our health system in comparison with continuous therapy which is much more expensive for our health system, which we know has a lot of tribulations in terms of funding and such.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...