Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Takeda (Gold) and Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

EHA 2025 | 72-week results from MANIFEST-2: pelabresib plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis

Claire Harrison, MD, FRCP, FRCPath, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, discusses the 72-week results from the Phase III MANIFEST-2 study (NCT04603495), investigating pelabresib plus ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis. Prof. Harrison reports encouraging findings on the long-term efficacy and durability of the combination. This interview took place at the 30th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) in Milan, Italy.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

The MANIFEST-2 study assessed pelabresib, which is a BET inhibitor, targeting some of the key pathways, including NF-kappa B in myelofibrosis. And we’ve had a longstanding interest now for over 10 years, actually, recruiting patients into studies with pelabresib. And what was really important to see in the 72-week data for MANIFEST-2, which was an upfront study comparing patients who are still ongoing in a randomization between ruxolitinib plus or minus pelabresib or placebo, was that we continued to see almost double the number of patients achieving both SVR 35 and TSS50 out at week 72...

The MANIFEST-2 study assessed pelabresib, which is a BET inhibitor, targeting some of the key pathways, including NF-kappa B in myelofibrosis. And we’ve had a longstanding interest now for over 10 years, actually, recruiting patients into studies with pelabresib. And what was really important to see in the 72-week data for MANIFEST-2, which was an upfront study comparing patients who are still ongoing in a randomization between ruxolitinib plus or minus pelabresib or placebo, was that we continued to see almost double the number of patients achieving both SVR 35 and TSS50 out at week 72. We also saw very nice data with bone marrow fibrosis reduction, ongoing good safety signal, slightly more dysgeusia, slightly more thrombocytopenia, but otherwise really a balance with adverse events, despite adding a second agent. Of course, the kind of question of the moment is the issue with blast phase and accelerated phase, whether there were more of those in patients treated with pelabresib. And actually, it looks like at the week 72 slot that actually the patients on the control arm are sort of catching up. So suggesting even more that this was probably, you know, bad luck and a blip, even though, you know, there were intermediate one risk patients in this study, these patients still can get this devastating consequence. The other important data that we showed in this presentation, which came from Alessandro Vannucchi was that overall progression-free and leukaemia-free survival were not adverse and if anything possibly look like they might be coming, you know, better for the combination although it’s probably too early to say that. Still very interesting looking for the week 96 data now and super important.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Research funding: Celgene, Constellation, Novartis; Advisory role: AbbVie, AOP, BMS, Celgene, CTI, Novartis, Galacteo, Geron, Gilead, Janssen, Keros, Promedior, Roche, Shire, Sierra.