We are generally following the guidelines and there is currently an update of the ESMO guidelines that will be further updated, I suppose, in the next month. So the first layer of decision is actually based on the biomarker profile, meaning that we should assess patients for the presence of 17p deletion, TP53 mutation, and immunoglobulin gene mutation status. But then, provided that we are not using chemoimmunotherapy anymore, luckily enough, we can further tailor treatment decisions based on one side on the comorbidity burden, the age, the concomitant medications, and on the other side, of course, we should take into account patient preferences...
We are generally following the guidelines and there is currently an update of the ESMO guidelines that will be further updated, I suppose, in the next month. So the first layer of decision is actually based on the biomarker profile, meaning that we should assess patients for the presence of 17p deletion, TP53 mutation, and immunoglobulin gene mutation status. But then, provided that we are not using chemoimmunotherapy anymore, luckily enough, we can further tailor treatment decisions based on one side on the comorbidity burden, the age, the concomitant medications, and on the other side, of course, we should take into account patient preferences. So I dare say that the general principle of the guidelines is that whenever we have available evidence of similar efficacy and similar or even better tolerability, we should favor fixed-duration treatments compared to continuous general BTKi treatment.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.