My main research focus is MRD in MDS, so measurable residual disease in myelodysplastic syndromes. And there’s an unmet need of sensitive markers in the clinic for MDS. However, a lot of research has shown that there’s a prognostic value for MRD in MDS, and the most recent EBMT international expert recommended the usage of MRD post-transplant. So we have already in a Nordic study shown the prognostic value of MRD in MDS, and my project that I’m presenting here at the EHA focuses on redefining the method that was used in this project...
My main research focus is MRD in MDS, so measurable residual disease in myelodysplastic syndromes. And there’s an unmet need of sensitive markers in the clinic for MDS. However, a lot of research has shown that there’s a prognostic value for MRD in MDS, and the most recent EBMT international expert recommended the usage of MRD post-transplant. So we have already in a Nordic study shown the prognostic value of MRD in MDS, and my project that I’m presenting here at the EHA focuses on redefining the method that was used in this project.
So I have used the same patient material and analyzed MRD in CD34+ cells, so stem cells, where we suppose that the source of relapse for the MDS disease would be harbored. So in my study we could see that MRD positivity occurred at the same time points or even earlier and that the clonal involvement was significantly higher in the sorted cells. And what’s mainly different from previous publications that have already shown the prognostic value of MRD in stem cells is that this method that we have used is a method that would be used in the clinic. It would be a method that could be clinically applicable in the lab, since this is a method that is already in clinical use for chimerism analysis, for example.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.