Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Takeda (Gold) and Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Outcomes of patients with IDH1/2-mutated accelerated/blast-phase MPNs in the era of IDH inhibitors

Anand Patel, MD, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, discusses the findings of a large multi-center retrospective analysis of the outcomes of patients with IDH1/2-mutated accelerated/blast-phase (AP-BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) treated with four different therapeutic approaches. While there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the treatment regimens examined, numerically, patients who received IDH inhibitor-based therapy or hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy without venetoclax had better outcomes. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

Yeah, so I’ve had the privilege of leading a large multi-center retrospective analysis of patients with accelerated and blast-phase MPNs. We’re really focusing on how they do in the current era of therapy, so 2017 to the modern day. So within this cohort of about 200 patients, we have 35 that had an IDH1 or IDH2 mutation. There have been retrospective reports previously, including by our group, suggesting that these patients may have an excellent response to IDH inhibitor-based therapy and have durable long-term overall survival...

Yeah, so I’ve had the privilege of leading a large multi-center retrospective analysis of patients with accelerated and blast-phase MPNs. We’re really focusing on how they do in the current era of therapy, so 2017 to the modern day. So within this cohort of about 200 patients, we have 35 that had an IDH1 or IDH2 mutation. There have been retrospective reports previously, including by our group, suggesting that these patients may have an excellent response to IDH inhibitor-based therapy and have durable long-term overall survival. So we wanted to specifically look at that question within our cohort of patients. 

So when talking about the entire cohort, median overall survival was less than a year, it was about 0.8 years. However, when you look specifically at the IDH1 or IDH2-mutated patients, we found a median overall survival of over two years. Part of that, we wanted to get a sense of, is this being driven by the therapy that they’re receiving? So we did stratify these patients based on frontline treatment approach. So we looked at intensive chemotherapy, HMA plus venetoclax, IDH inhibitors in the frontline setting, or HMA-based therapy that does not include venetoclax. And while there is no statistical difference in overall survival between those four arms, numerically, the patients that did the best were those that received HMA-based therapy without venetoclax or IDH inhibitor-based therapy, with our hypothesis being, given that MPNs are not a BCL2-dependent disease, venetoclax may not be offering the same sort of responses that we see in AML while still giving toxicity such as myelosuppression. Therefore, patients that are not getting intensive chemo or HMA-VEN may have better tolerability to therapy, and therefore they can stay on therapy. 

So we’re looking to dive into this further and get a sense of if there are other drivers of improved outcomes in IDH1 or IDH2 accelerated or blast-phase MPNs. That being said, these may be a silver lining in a very difficult to treat patient population who have historically been very, very underserved by the therapeutic options we have for them.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Sumitomo: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Sobi: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kronos Bio: Research Funding.