So we don’t have any completed studies with comparative data. However, what I can say is that I’m excited to see the results whenever they do come out, which I would expect would be another year or two from another phase three BRUIN program, which is pirto plus venR versus venR alone asking the question is the addition of a non-covalent inhibitor to an effective relapse regimen, venR, going to lead to a better patient outcomes...
So we don’t have any completed studies with comparative data. However, what I can say is that I’m excited to see the results whenever they do come out, which I would expect would be another year or two from another phase three BRUIN program, which is pirto plus venR versus venR alone asking the question is the addition of a non-covalent inhibitor to an effective relapse regimen, venR, going to lead to a better patient outcomes.
There was also some really exciting data from MD Anderson looking at pirto in the frontline combined with venO. However, there’s no comparator arm in that study, so we can’t really say pirto-venO is better than venO alone. You’d need a phase three study. There will be an exciting study led by the German CLL group of venO versus P plus V. And there’s two PV arms: one is time-limited, fixed-duration, the other is MRD-directed. So that one will obviously take quite a while to read out. I think it’s just starting to accrue, but that’ll be very interesting to see can we move pirto to the front line as a time-limited regimen.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.