In this study, which has been a multicenter and international collaboration with other studies, led by the Spanish group of Transplant Cell Therapies, basically we observed that since bispecific antibodies are one of the possibly preferred therapeutic salvage strategies for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy, the first thing that we would like to test if we are using such a strategy, if this could have an impact, especially about toxicity or on patients who will receive eventually a myeloallogenic transplantation...
In this study, which has been a multicenter and international collaboration with other studies, led by the Spanish group of Transplant Cell Therapies, basically we observed that since bispecific antibodies are one of the possibly preferred therapeutic salvage strategies for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy, the first thing that we would like to test if we are using such a strategy, if this could have an impact, especially about toxicity or on patients who will receive eventually a myeloallogenic transplantation. And we observe that there is not an augmented concern about toxicity in this setting.
The other thing is that results are good. So for those patients which have been treated with bispecific antibodies who reached at least a partial response but the majority of them reached a complete response and followed by allogeneic transplant with any kind of donor and mostly with post-transplant cyclophosphamide GvHD prophylaxis, results are good and the cure rate is about 50 percent and we observed a plateau in survival curves after about one to two years. So hopefully these patients will be cured. And so the message is that yes, if you want to pursue an allogeneic transplantation after bispecifics, you can. Results are good and you don’t have to worry about increased toxicity.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.