Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Lymphoma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), BMS (Gold), Johnson & Johnson (Gold), Takeda (Silver) and Galapagos (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Reducing the intensity of conditioning chemotherapy to promote GvL and reduce GvHD

Issa Khouri, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, comments on the challenges of reducing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) while preserving the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. He highlights that reducing the intensity of the conditioning regimen with the addition of targeted agents is a strategy to promote GvL activity without increasing GvHD risk. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I think one of the most important risk factors of graft-versus-host disease, obviously there is age, there is the conditioning regimen, the conditioning intensity. And the conditioning intensity has been throughout the years found to be associated with a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease. And so the whole idea right now is to see if we can lessen the intensity of the chemotherapy from myeloablative to reduced intensity or even non-myeloablative but with the addition of targeted agents that can help control the disease and promote time for the graft-versus-leukemia to develop without increasing the risk because in some malignancies like ALL or Richter’s if you use very low-dose chemotherapy the cancer cells can overcome the graft-versus-leukemia or graft-versus-lymphoma generated by the donor cells because the donor cells’ activity in generating this anti-tumor activity is powerful but it’s slow in time so you want to put a lid on the disease with the conditioning to give time for the graft-versus-leukemia and graft-versus-lymphoma to develop...

I think one of the most important risk factors of graft-versus-host disease, obviously there is age, there is the conditioning regimen, the conditioning intensity. And the conditioning intensity has been throughout the years found to be associated with a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease. And so the whole idea right now is to see if we can lessen the intensity of the chemotherapy from myeloablative to reduced intensity or even non-myeloablative but with the addition of targeted agents that can help control the disease and promote time for the graft-versus-leukemia to develop without increasing the risk because in some malignancies like ALL or Richter’s if you use very low-dose chemotherapy the cancer cells can overcome the graft-versus-leukemia or graft-versus-lymphoma generated by the donor cells because the donor cells’ activity in generating this anti-tumor activity is powerful but it’s slow in time so you want to put a lid on the disease with the conditioning to give time for the graft-versus-leukemia and graft-versus-lymphoma to develop. So I think lowering down the intensity of the conditioning, but with the addition of targeted therapy, I think this is one of the ways to promote graft-versus-leukemia or graft-versus-lymphoma without the risk of graft-versus-host disease.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.