Well, there are many, many excellent pediatric consortia that do clinical trials for new therapies and for how to utilize available therapies. They, unfortunately, while they’re consortia, they’re still too small to meet the kind of data requirements for regulatory approval, and also, we realized, when I brought together a group of pediatric leukemia experts from Europe, the US, Australia, and Canada, we realized that there are different standards of care in terms of what therapies are used because different drugs are approved in different regions...
Well, there are many, many excellent pediatric consortia that do clinical trials for new therapies and for how to utilize available therapies. They, unfortunately, while they’re consortia, they’re still too small to meet the kind of data requirements for regulatory approval, and also, we realized, when I brought together a group of pediatric leukemia experts from Europe, the US, Australia, and Canada, we realized that there are different standards of care in terms of what therapies are used because different drugs are approved in different regions. And there is no one way that relapse disease is treated, nor is there even an agreement on endpoints. So, the endpoint – one great example is what is complete remission in Germany is a completely different platelet count than what is complete remission in Philadelphia. So, how do you combine data sets together when it’s different drugs, different endpoints? You can’t. And so, everything in pediatrics has been underpowered. And unfortunately, that means that new therapies aren’t getting approved. Lots of studies are done, but either they end early or they aren’t of sufficient size to change what the standard of care is. And that is only going to get worse as we get better at subsetting our cancers with our precision medicine and our ability now to really understand the molecular biology of some of these tumors.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.