Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

SOHO 2023 | Diagnosis and risk stratification in Hodgkin lymphoma: updates and novel approaches

Stephen Ansell, MD, PhD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, shares some updates on the diagnosis and risk stratification of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), commenting on whether nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) should be considered a Hodgkin lymphoma or a B-cell lymphoma. Prof. Ansell also highlights the value of PET responses in the risk stratification of patients, and further comments on the potential application of cell-free DNA approaches. This interview took place at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society of Hematologic Oncology (SOHO 2023) held in Houston, TX.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

In the world of Hodgkin lymphoma, when it comes to diagnosis, I think not a lot has changed in the past year. I think what has changed a little bit is the discussion about what to call nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, which is a rare subset and whether that should be Hodgkin lymphoma or just a B-cell lymphoma is some measure of debate. As far as risk stratification of patients, I think we’re having greater and greater understanding of who are the patients that are at risk for having less than an optimal outcome with therapy...

In the world of Hodgkin lymphoma, when it comes to diagnosis, I think not a lot has changed in the past year. I think what has changed a little bit is the discussion about what to call nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, which is a rare subset and whether that should be Hodgkin lymphoma or just a B-cell lymphoma is some measure of debate. As far as risk stratification of patients, I think we’re having greater and greater understanding of who are the patients that are at risk for having less than an optimal outcome with therapy. I think that still comes down to, at this point, PET responses. When patients respond well and when they have less bulky disease, as measured by metabolic tumor volumes, those are the patients that typically may have a better outcome. Not quite yet in standard practice, but hopefully to come, would be the use of soluble proteins and cell-free DNA approaches. But at this point those are not really ready for prime time. So the use of typical immunohistochemistry as diagnostic criteria, and then the use of PET scans as a way to determine response and use that as a predictive outcome is mainly how Hodgkin is being managed.

Read more...