So when I see a patient who has had a treatment-related AML, so someone who’s gotten chemotherapy for breast cancer or lymphoma or had a prior autologous transplant, if they are fit for intensive induction, which is a discussion all unto itself, I do favor the use of CPX-351 based on the data from the registrational 301 trial showing that patients with treatment-related AML had an overall survival of 12 months versus only six months for those who got seven and three...
So when I see a patient who has had a treatment-related AML, so someone who’s gotten chemotherapy for breast cancer or lymphoma or had a prior autologous transplant, if they are fit for intensive induction, which is a discussion all unto itself, I do favor the use of CPX-351 based on the data from the registrational 301 trial showing that patients with treatment-related AML had an overall survival of 12 months versus only six months for those who got seven and three. We don’t have that same kind of comparison for patients with HMA venetoclax, but if a patient is someone that I would not consider for an intensive induction, that’s when I would use HMA venetoclax even in the setting of a prior chemotherapy.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.