Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Community Focus Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

The Lymphoma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), BMS (Gold), Johnson & Johnson (Gold), Takeda (Silver) and Galapagos (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ICML 2025 | Key challenges associated with treating CNS lymphomas & advice for community oncologists

Kathryn Tringale, MD, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, discusses the challenges of treating primary CNS lymphomas, highlighting the importance of patient selection and multidisciplinary collaboration. Dr Tringale also comments on the importance of considering alternative consolidation regimens, such as reduced-dose whole-brain radiation, as a safe and effective approach. She concludes by emphasizing the importance of addressing the risk of neurotoxicity in these patients. This interview took place during the 18th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (18-ICML) in Lugano, Switzerland.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

I think it’s a great question because I do think it’s a very nuanced and challenging disease to treat. And when I say disease, I mean, it’s a host of diseases. So I think first I alluded to when talking about the different consolidation regimens, it’s all about patient selection. So really understanding your patient and the toxicity profiles and risk factors before making a selection for consolidation regimens and even induction, what you think the patient can tolerate...

I think it’s a great question because I do think it’s a very nuanced and challenging disease to treat. And when I say disease, I mean, it’s a host of diseases. So I think first I alluded to when talking about the different consolidation regimens, it’s all about patient selection. So really understanding your patient and the toxicity profiles and risk factors before making a selection for consolidation regimens and even induction, what you think the patient can tolerate. So one, I think is important to think about patient selection. Two, it’s all about multidisciplinary collaboration, which I think is a blessing and can make things more challenging too. So you really have to collaborate. And so when I’m thinking about these patients who are seen by community oncologists, you may or may not have access to a blood and marrow transplant team. And so I think my recommendation stems from our work looking at different consolidation regimens is if patients are ineligible for transplant. You don’t think your patient’s the right patient for a transplant, or you don’t have access to a transplant. I would really consider using this reduced-dose whole brain radiation as opposed to just non-myeloablative chemotherapy for some of these patients. And then I think finally, another challenge, again, as a radiation oncologist is not debunking the myth of neurotoxicity, because I do think that’s based on years of data showing that these higher doses of whole brain radiation can be neurotoxic, although they can be a great disease control approach. I think the challenge has been really just informing everyone that there’s different doses with different outcomes and different toxicity profiles. So I think that we really need to consider reduced dose as a totally separate approach than standard dose whole brain when we’re talking about consolidation. At Sloan-Kettering, we also combined all of our data. This was published last year in the Red Journal looking at cerebral atrophy over time after different consolidation regimens. And we actually showed that all primary CNS lymphoma patients after induction basically have cerebral atrophy over time compared to the normal population as they age. So we know that they have cerebral atrophy. I think a huge part of this is the high-dose methotrexate. But our main finding was really that that rate of change over time did not differ by consolidation regimen. So it was similar between transplant patients and reduced dose whole brain radiation patients. So yeah, final one I think is a challenge is thinking about neurotoxicity. And I’d like to remind community oncologists to consider reduced dose whole brain radiation as a safe and effective approach for patients.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

My research efforts are also partially supported by the UCSD Moores Cancer Center Support Grant.