We studied how the patient in the real world responds to CPX because most patients that will receive CPX are patients with secondary AML and those are elderly patients with AML secondary sometimes to other neoplasms so most of them would not be eligible to clinical trials. So we wanted to see in the real world how they do, if it’s any way different from the clinical trial that led to the approval of the drug...
We studied how the patient in the real world responds to CPX because most patients that will receive CPX are patients with secondary AML and those are elderly patients with AML secondary sometimes to other neoplasms so most of them would not be eligible to clinical trials. So we wanted to see in the real world how they do, if it’s any way different from the clinical trial that led to the approval of the drug. What we saw is that in the real world there is no difference from what was observed in the clinical trial both in terms of CR rate and survival, and then we compared with our historical data with intensified fludarabine treatment for secondary AML and what we saw is that with CPX we got more responses and less toxicities.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.