Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), AbbVie (Platinum), BeOne Medicines (Silver) and Lilly (Silver). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

The Community Focus Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

iwCLL 2025 | The current and future role of pirtobrutinib in the management of CLL

Catherine Coombs, MD, UC Irvine Health, Orange County, CA, comments on the current role of pirtobrutinib in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), stating that it is her agent of choice in the third-line or later setting. Dr Coombs suggests that findings from the BRUIN-321 trial (NCT04666038) may lead to pirtobrutinib being approved by the FDA as a second-line option. This interview took place at the biennial International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) 2025 in Krakow, Poland.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So I think the current role of pirtobrutinib as a no-brainer is that it’s my go-to drug in the third line or beyond setting, meaning patients failed by not only covalent BTK inhibitors, but also venetoclax. However, I do think we’ll see a broader label for pirtobrutinib following hopefully an earlier FDA approval based on the BRUIN-321 trial, which may lead to the ability to use it in the second-line space...

So I think the current role of pirtobrutinib as a no-brainer is that it’s my go-to drug in the third line or beyond setting, meaning patients failed by not only covalent BTK inhibitors, but also venetoclax. However, I do think we’ll see a broader label for pirtobrutinib following hopefully an earlier FDA approval based on the BRUIN-321 trial, which may lead to the ability to use it in the second-line space. And this is actually already supported by the NCCN guidelines that list pirto as an option in the second-line space. I think we don’t know if pirto is better than venetoclax in the second line. Obviously, these haven’t been directly compared, but I would consider both reasonable options, and I think should be offered to patients. And often the ultimate decision on what drug is the best for any given patient comes down to not only the efficacy data from these trials, but to some extent patient preference. And so I think one of the beautiful things about pirto is just the pure ease of administration. And so we also now can see data supporting its efficacy in the post-covalent BTKi setting, first from the BRUIN Phase I/II, but also further seen in the BRUIN-321 trial.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeOne Medicines, Lilly, Genentech, Janssen.