Yes, so we assessed patients both in the UK in a single centre and in many centres in Italy, patient-reported outcomes to assess as a primary endpoint whether patients experiencing chronic hemolysis, whether they had worse outcomes, patient-perceived outcomes, compared to those that did not. So we used LDH threshold to differentiate the patients. We used the EORTC-QLQ-C30, which is the instrument that has been frequently used in PNH, and we wanted to evaluate also a new instrument, which is the QLQ-AA/PNH, which is specifically designed for PNH...
Yes, so we assessed patients both in the UK in a single centre and in many centres in Italy, patient-reported outcomes to assess as a primary endpoint whether patients experiencing chronic hemolysis, whether they had worse outcomes, patient-perceived outcomes, compared to those that did not. So we used LDH threshold to differentiate the patients. We used the EORTC-QLQ-C30, which is the instrument that has been frequently used in PNH, and we wanted to evaluate also a new instrument, which is the QLQ-AA/PNH, which is specifically designed for PNH. What we found was that LDH did not distinguish patients for patient-reported outcomes. However, there was a very strong correlation between hemoglobin levels and the patient-reported outcome measures. And only the QLQ, the PNH-specific instrument, for several domains was able to distinguish patients with more than 10 hemoglobin level. Again, we still have this threshold of 10, and less than 10 who perceived a better quality of life. So again, it’s a recommendation that patients should reach more than 10 hemoglobin level to live a better life.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.