So this is one of the primary endpoints of the trial COMMODORE 1 and COMMODORE 2. These trials were set up to look at the safety and endpoints of breakthrough hemolysis and transfusion independence for patients on crovalimab compared to eculizumab. Both of these medications are C5 inhibitors, however crovalimab is given every four weeks and it’s given by a subcutaneous injection which patients can self-administer...
So this is one of the primary endpoints of the trial COMMODORE 1 and COMMODORE 2. These trials were set up to look at the safety and endpoints of breakthrough hemolysis and transfusion independence for patients on crovalimab compared to eculizumab. Both of these medications are C5 inhibitors, however crovalimab is given every four weeks and it’s given by a subcutaneous injection which patients can self-administer. The poster itself demonstrates that the breakthrough hemolysis events were similar on both medications. However, the breakthrough events in the crovalimab arm were mainly associated with CACs which is a complement activating situation like an infection or pregnancy or surgery; whereas the eculizumab arm seems to be more associated with breakthrough events likely due to pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, whereby the drug may not be in sufficient quantity in the patient’s system. Interestingly, crovalimab is dose-adjusted based on weight, whereas eculizumab is a fixed dose, so those may be contributory.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.