Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

iwCLL 2023 | Real-world safety and efficacy of first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors in CLL

Raul Cordoba, MD, PhD, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain, discusses the real-world safety and efficacy of first-and second-generation BTK inhibitors used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including ibrutinib and acalabrutinib. This interview took place at the biennial International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) 2023 meeting, held in Boston, MA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

We have presented data here at the iwCLL workshop in 2023 about real world evidence data about the use of first and second generation BTK inhibitors in patients with CLL. What we have seen is that the efficacy data is almost the same as the data that we have seen previously reported in clinical trials, and we have not seen any other significant safety signals when having a longer follow-up than those published in the clinical trials...

We have presented data here at the iwCLL workshop in 2023 about real world evidence data about the use of first and second generation BTK inhibitors in patients with CLL. What we have seen is that the efficacy data is almost the same as the data that we have seen previously reported in clinical trials, and we have not seen any other significant safety signals when having a longer follow-up than those published in the clinical trials. What we have seen in Spain is that the treatment pattern is a bit different between the two different BTKi’s that we have in our country. We saw that ibrutinib was more commonly used in the last five to six years because it was first approved in Spain, and in most of the cases it has been used in the relapsed/refractory setting. While second generation, such as acalabrutinib is more commonly used in first line. With regard to efficacy, we didn’t see any differences between them as the trials that have been published a few years ago, and with regards to safety, we have only seen differences with regards to hypertension. So patients treated with ibrutinib are more likely to have high blood pressure figures than those patients treated with acalabrutinib. And we didn’t see any differences with regards to other cardiovascular toxicities, such as atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias. So at the end, we can conclude that, despite our patients in the real world practice probably most of them were not eligible to participate in the trials, the outcome is going to be almost the same as the data published in the clinical trials.

Read more...