So today I presented something at the session, called ‘are we personalizing MDS therapy in this modern era?’ And my topic encompassed how we’re incorporating molecular markers into both the diagnostic and classification and the prognostication schemes. And so what we learned from all of the work over the probably past 10, 15 years is that the molecular underpinnings of MDS is not only complex, but thankfully somewhat predictable, in that the higher the grade disease, the more mutations that are seen, and that there are particular classes of mutations that appear to both be essential for diagnosis but also be very important in the prognostic setting...
So today I presented something at the session, called ‘are we personalizing MDS therapy in this modern era?’ And my topic encompassed how we’re incorporating molecular markers into both the diagnostic and classification and the prognostication schemes. And so what we learned from all of the work over the probably past 10, 15 years is that the molecular underpinnings of MDS is not only complex, but thankfully somewhat predictable, in that the higher the grade disease, the more mutations that are seen, and that there are particular classes of mutations that appear to both be essential for diagnosis but also be very important in the prognostic setting. And so we’re seeing this revolution in our ability to more accurately give a patient accurate prognosis based on these molecular findings, something that we saw in the 1990s when we first started to incorporate cytogenetic abnormalities, we’re doing the same today with mutations.
And so the new IPSS-M, which was released last year, is now actually much more accurate than the previous version, the IPSS-R, in that the concordance indices are now improved by about 5% for both leukemia-free survival and for overall survival of all the categories of patients. And MDS patients nowadays, with the IPSS-M and the availability of molecular findings, we see that these MDS patients, when they have a new class in their prognosis score, they’re often upgraded or they actually get better separated into an intermediate high and an intermediate low group. So we think that with this improved prognosis that this will lead to better management.