Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), AbbVie (Platinum), BeOne Medicines (Silver) and Lilly (Silver). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

The Community Focus Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | The management of CLL within the UK’s NHS framework

Piers Patten, MB ChB, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD, King’s College London, London, UK, comments on the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) within the UK’s national health service (NHS) framework. He discusses the availability of licensed treatments and the shift towards fixed-duration regimens. Dr Patten emphasizes the importance of individualized patient discussions to determine the most suitable treatment approach. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

I think we’re lucky actually within the NHS that we’re able to access nearly all of the licensed treatments in both the frontline and relapsed setting using the newer agents. In frontline, we have access to the perhaps more traditional continuous monotherapies, certainly both acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib are now both established as a very go-to regime for your frontline patients particularly those ones who perhaps are a little bit older perhaps want the ease and convenience of having a single monotherapy a tablet at home certainly doesn’t require too much monitoring to commence treatment which I think can be attractive...

I think we’re lucky actually within the NHS that we’re able to access nearly all of the licensed treatments in both the frontline and relapsed setting using the newer agents. In frontline, we have access to the perhaps more traditional continuous monotherapies, certainly both acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib are now both established as a very go-to regime for your frontline patients particularly those ones who perhaps are a little bit older perhaps want the ease and convenience of having a single monotherapy a tablet at home certainly doesn’t require too much monitoring to commence treatment which I think can be attractive. However, I think we’re increasingly going towards the fixed duration therapies and we’re using both fixed duration ibrutinib-venetoclax and fixed duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab, both well-established reimbursed licensed regimes. I think those continue to sort of have equal balance of those patients who go through combination therapy where you’re likely just to see perhaps more side effects when you’ve got two drugs rather than one at the initial phase and the need to attend hospital for the obinutuzumab infusions or the venetoclax ramp up. But they have the attractiveness that those patients will come off therapy, and I think that can be desirable for patients. So important to have a very good, thorough discussion with patients about everything, about their disease, about other medical conditions they might have or reasons to choose therapy. But ultimately, in nearly all cases, it’s down to what suits the patient best. I think the major exception to that is if they’ve got a genomically very high risk disease, and I would include those patients with p53 disruption, where you might favour a longer duration treatment than the current fixed duration treatments in terms of improved PFS. But I think that’s a discussion you should have with patients and expectations. And I don’t think any of the available treatments that we use today, which does not include any form of chemoimmunotherapy, should necessarily be excluded.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding.