The other important late-breaking abstract that was presented on Saturday at the Tandem meetings was the SIERRA trial. The SIERRA trial was a randomized trial of Iomab-B, which is a CD45 radio-immune conjugate that targets hematopoietic stem cells, and against conventional chemotherapy. The main endpoint was durable complete remissions at six months.
I think it’s important to note that in this randomized trial, 76 patients were randomized to Iomab-B, 77 patients were randomized to conventional care...
The other important late-breaking abstract that was presented on Saturday at the Tandem meetings was the SIERRA trial. The SIERRA trial was a randomized trial of Iomab-B, which is a CD45 radio-immune conjugate that targets hematopoietic stem cells, and against conventional chemotherapy. The main endpoint was durable complete remissions at six months.
I think it’s important to note that in this randomized trial, 76 patients were randomized to Iomab-B, 77 patients were randomized to conventional care. At the end, 66 patients on the Iomab-B arm got transplanted while only 14 patients got a conventional transplant in the control arm. However, 44 patients in the control arm that failed to achieve a remission to re-induction treatment went on to cross over to Iomab, which 40 were transplanted. The important adult disease characteristics were similar across all groups.
I think the durable complete remission rate was significantly better for the Iomab-B arm, with a durable complete remission rate of 28% versus 0.2% in the conventional chemotherapy arm. Overall, durable complete remission was defined at six months, but even patients are now continuing in remission, with 58% of those patients in remission now for two years or more. The event-free survival was significantly better for patients randomized to Iomab-B, 28% versus 0.2%. The one-year survival was also better, 26% for Iomab-B versus 13%. It’s important that survival for Iomab-B patients were doubled compared to the conventional chemotherapy controls that did not want crossover. The patients on the crossover arm actually had a survival that was similar to those who were randomized initially to Iomab-B.
Again, I think this is a game-changer. It’s a potential new and novel strategy for bridging patients with active disease. Remember, to be eligible patients that have more than 5% blast, the median blast was 30%. Many of these patients would not even be considered candidates for allotransplant because of their tumor burden. So Iomab-B is a unique strategy that allows us to bridge elder patients with active disease to an allogeneic transplant.