So brentuximab with AVD has been demonstrated in the ECHELON-1 study to be superior to ABVD with six-year progression-free and overall survival benefit; however the BV-AVD regimen is currently being supplanted by a nivo-AVD which I think is going to push brentuximab back into the later lines of therapy, it’s an appealing drug to incorporate in the salvage setting, and it also makes me revisit the role of consolidative brentuximab vedotin after autologous stem cell transplant...
So brentuximab with AVD has been demonstrated in the ECHELON-1 study to be superior to ABVD with six-year progression-free and overall survival benefit; however the BV-AVD regimen is currently being supplanted by a nivo-AVD which I think is going to push brentuximab back into the later lines of therapy, it’s an appealing drug to incorporate in the salvage setting, and it also makes me revisit the role of consolidative brentuximab vedotin after autologous stem cell transplant. The AETHERA trial many years ago now demonstrated that consolidation with 16 cycles of brentuximab after autologous transplant led to improvements in progression-free survival over placebo control arm, but the use of brentuximab consolidation had kind of fallen out of favor as we were using that drug more often in frontline and second-line therapy. Now that we’re going to be seeing more patients who are naive to brentuximab in the relapsed setting, I can see revisiting the use of consolidative brentuximab for more patients especially if they are naive to the drug or responded well to it in a salvage regimen.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.