Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Myelodysplastic Syndromes Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Geron (Silver). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | HRQoL outcomes with luspatercept vs epoetin alfa in transfusion-dependent LR-MDS: COMMANDS analysis

Esther Oliva, MD, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy, comments on the results of an analysis of data from the Phase III COMMANDS study (NCT03682536), which compared luspatercept and epoetin alfa for treating transfusion-dependent lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS). Dr Oliva highlights that luspatercept demonstrated a sustained benefit over epoetin alfa on shortening the time to achieving a meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or delaying the time to experience a significant HRQoL deterioration. The findings further confirms that luspatercept is an an appropriate first-line treatment for patients with transfusion-dependent LR-MDS. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

The COMMANDS study is a randomized global trial comparing luspatercept and epoetin alfa for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with anemia requiring transfusions. So the results of the trial for the primary efficacy endpoint have been already published, where luspatercept is superior to epoetin alfa in inducing transfusion independence for the duration of at least 12 weeks and a concomitant rise in 1...

The COMMANDS study is a randomized global trial comparing luspatercept and epoetin alfa for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with anemia requiring transfusions. So the results of the trial for the primary efficacy endpoint have been already published, where luspatercept is superior to epoetin alfa in inducing transfusion independence for the duration of at least 12 weeks and a concomitant rise in 1.5 grams per deciliter hemoglobin. We have previously reported also the benefits in terms of patient reported outcomes of reaching this endpoint showing more benefit in the luspatercept versus the epoetin alfa in improving patient-reported outcomes. However, when we pooled the patients to analyze the significance of increasing hemoglobin levels, we found a threshold of 10 grams per deciliter of hemoglobin to induce a patient perceived response, so a benefit in terms of fatigue and dyspnea with respect to those who reached the endpoint but did not go beyond 10 grams per deciliter. 

So at this point, in the poster that I’m presenting this afternoon, we are reporting the sustained benefit in patient reported outcomes which was prevalent in the luspatercept arm compared to the epoetin alfa where 30% of patients reached a sustained benefit with luspatercept versus about 20% in the epoetin, and this was for the FACT anemia, the FACT fatigue scores and the EORTC QLQ fatigue scores. Furthermore we wanted to see whether reaching a sustained benefit was earlier for luspatercept versus epoetin alfa and this was true for almost all of the FACT anemia subscales. Now we also wanted to see, for those patients who had a good quality of life at the time of enrollment, whether the time to deterioration was in favor of one or the other drug and it was in favor of luspatercept, deterioration meaning at relapse at the time of a transfusion. So luspatercept delayed relapse with transfusion so the duration is longer with luspatercept and this is also associated with a delay in worsening of patient reported outcomes, and this was true for all the domains of the FACT and of the EORTC QLQ-C30. This shows that luspatercept is an appropriate drug for first-line treatment of patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes requiring transfusions.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli: Current Employment; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Halia Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ryvu: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties.