Yeah, I think one of the reasons that I like treating people with MPNs, and I think a lot of my colleagues here do too, is that MPNs really deserve an individualized approach more so than other types of cancer, right? So for a new ET patient, that could be someone who’s 30 years old and has a very low risk of thrombosis, but maybe is at a higher risk of transformation, versus an 85-year-old patient who was just diagnosed, who was very asymptomatic and just needs a little bit of thrombosis risk reduction...
Yeah, I think one of the reasons that I like treating people with MPNs, and I think a lot of my colleagues here do too, is that MPNs really deserve an individualized approach more so than other types of cancer, right? So for a new ET patient, that could be someone who’s 30 years old and has a very low risk of thrombosis, but maybe is at a higher risk of transformation, versus an 85-year-old patient who was just diagnosed, who was very asymptomatic and just needs a little bit of thrombosis risk reduction. So I think the most important thing for physicians seeing new patients is to figure out what’s most important to that patient. Is it mitigating thrombotic risk? Is it mitigating the risk of disease transformation? Is it helping symptoms? And tailoring treatment based on that. So some treatments we know are better at reducing symptom burden, but maybe less apt at reducing platelet numbers and vice versa. And as we continue to have more therapies, I think we’ll have even more kind of refined and nuanced discussions in that space.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.