Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Acute Myeloid Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Silver), and through an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

EHA 2025 | MRD assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry as an early endpoint of treatment efficacy in AML

Bruno Paiva, PhD, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, comments on the potential of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry as a valid early endpoint of treatment efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Dr Paiva highlights that demonstrating MRD’s sensitivity and prognostic value compared to conventional response criteria is crucial, and that this approach has shown promise in various treatment scenarios. This interview took place at the 30th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) in Milan, Italy.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

After the precedent in myeloma achieved last year at the FDA ODAC hearing that led to the approval of MRD as a co-primary endpoint in multiple myeloma, there is now interest in escalating these findings and making it happen also in AML. Well, now we know the pathway to make it happen and the pathway must include clear demonstration that MRD is more sensitive and more prognostic than conventional response criteria...

After the precedent in myeloma achieved last year at the FDA ODAC hearing that led to the approval of MRD as a co-primary endpoint in multiple myeloma, there is now interest in escalating these findings and making it happen also in AML. Well, now we know the pathway to make it happen and the pathway must include clear demonstration that MRD is more sensitive and more prognostic than conventional response criteria. Number one, it should be applied in as many treatment scenarios as possible. In AML, particularly, patients eligible to intensive chemotherapy and patients that are ineligible, typically the elderly, prognostic in different genetic subgroups and to some extent the rates of MRD after each treatment strategy will correlate with event-free survival. The difference in the MRD-negative rates will correlate with different event-free survival after different treatment strategies. And this is what we try to demonstrate in this study. We do show that even decentralized multi-parameter flow cytometry with all its advantages and limitations is more sensitive and more prognostic than conventional complete response. It is a clear independent prognostic value, both in patients eligible and ineligible to intensive chemotherapy. It yields additional prognostic information in well-defined genetic risk groups. And we do see that MRD-negative rates are completely different after treatment schemas that are inducing longer versus shorter event-free survival.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...