Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Community Focus Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Johnson & Johnson (Gold). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

The Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Takeda (Gold) and Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

MPN Workshop of the Carolinas 2025 | Hematopathology in MPNs: the WHO vs ICC classifications & applying these in clinical practice

Sanam Loghavi, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, provides insight into hematopathology in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), discussing the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and World Health Organization (WHO) classification systems and highlighting the importance of an accurate diagnosis in patients with MPNs. Dr Loghavi also mentions the concept of myeloproliferative neoplasm unclassifiable (MPN-U), which she emphasizes should be reserved for cases that do not fit in any other category of MPNs. This interview took place at the 2nd Annual MPN Workshop of the Carolinas, held in Charlotte, NC.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So I’ll be speaking about the classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms, focusing on both the WHO and the ICC classification schemes. Thankfully, in the area of myeloproliferative neoplasms, there isn’t a lot of difference between the two classification systems. The approach is very much the same. There are some minor differences between the two, but it’s not, you know, it’s not a real issue like it is in MDS or AML...

So I’ll be speaking about the classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms, focusing on both the WHO and the ICC classification schemes. Thankfully, in the area of myeloproliferative neoplasms, there isn’t a lot of difference between the two classification systems. The approach is very much the same. There are some minor differences between the two, but it’s not, you know, it’s not a real issue like it is in MDS or AML. 

So the diagnosis is very important, right, because the care of every patient starts with a correct diagnosis; hopefully, if you don’t make an accurate diagnosis, the patient can’t get accurate care. So we take a lot of pride in making a good diagnosis for our patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. I think, you know, in some instances today, you can argue that some patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, like polycythemia vera, may not initially need a bone marrow biopsy, but we still do advocate for doing a bone marrow biopsy for morphologic evaluation for myeloproliferative neoplasms because sometimes you can have a patient that presents with signs and symptoms that, for all intents and purposes, look like essential thrombocythemia, but they actually have a pre-fibrotic myelofibrosis, and really, the only way to make that distinction is with doing the bone marrow biopsy. The classification systems, to go back to your original question, are really designed to capture these nuances and to make sure that we can identify these patients that are in the earlier stages of some of the more aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasms better and, you know, provide them with an accurate diagnosis that can hopefully lead to better outcomes in the future. 

Of course, I think, you know, there are always cases that haven’t read the books, and they don’t entirely fit into the classification box that we have arbitrarily created. So we do, thankfully, have a diagnostic category that is called myeloproliferative neoplasm unclassifiable. We try to reserve that really for cases that are truly unclassifiable, and, you know, we really can’t fit into one or another category, but we do leave that leeway for the pathologist because again, you don’t want to label someone with a disease that they don’t have. And so if they’re, you know, sometimes there are molecular features that overlap between several myeloproliferative neoplasms, or in the case of MDS/MPNs like CMML, they share features between myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, so sometimes the diagnosis is not straightforward, but we try to do the best that we can.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...