Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Acute Myeloid Leukemia Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from BMS (Silver), and through an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

EHA 2025 | The role of MRD monitoring in the management of FLT3-mutated AML

Musa Yilmaz, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, comments on the importance of monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly those with FLT3 mutations. Dr Yilmaz highlights that achieving MRD negativity is associated with a lower risk of relapse, and that FLT3 inhibitors can further reduce this risk. This interview took place at the 30th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) in Milan, Italy.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So the MRD is very important. Right now obviously it doesn’t dictate how we do induction and consolidation. We like to see though, we like to see if our patients achieve MRD negativity. For example, for FLT3 now we have much more sensitive assays, NGS assays, and we can detect the FLT3 at a sensitivity level of 10 to the minus 5, 10 to the minus 6. So patients who achieve MRD negativity, we know that the risk of relapses in general is lower in these patients...

So the MRD is very important. Right now obviously it doesn’t dictate how we do induction and consolidation. We like to see though, we like to see if our patients achieve MRD negativity. For example, for FLT3 now we have much more sensitive assays, NGS assays, and we can detect the FLT3 at a sensitivity level of 10 to the minus 5, 10 to the minus 6. So patients who achieve MRD negativity, we know that the risk of relapses in general is lower in these patients. But for the FLT3 purposes, obviously with the FLT3 ITD mutated patients right now, the general consensus is that they proceed with allogeneic transplant as a consolidation treatment. So, and when they go to transplant, we do FLT3 MRD assay before transplant, after transplant. And particularly patients who have MRD positivity in the peritransplant era, before or after, we know that the FLT3 inhibitors benefit those patients. It increases the risk of relapse. I’m sorry, it decreases the risk of relapse in these patients. That’s why we like to use FLT3 inhibitors. However, patients who already achieve a deep MRD negativity, the benefit of FLT3 inhibitors are not clear at this point. So technically, if they are MRD negative, adding FLT3 inhibitor, I’m talking based on the data from the Morpho trial with gilteritinib, we know that the overall survival is overlapping in those patients. But right now, if they are MRD positive, yes, it dictates how we treat. We do put these patients on FLT3 inhibitors as a maintenance therapy after allogeneic transplant.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...