Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

EBMT 2022 | Updates on REACH2: ruxolitinib vs BAT for SR-aGvHD

Mohamad Mohty, MD, PhD, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France, highlights some results from the Phase III REACH2 trial (NCT02913261), which investigated the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft versus host disease (SR-aGvHD). Prof. Mohty first explains the importance of this study, as it is the first Phase III trial in this disease area with positive results. Prof. Mohty then discusses the key findings of this trial, which indicate that there is a clear benefit to using ruxolitinib for the treatment of aGvHD, as seen in overall response rates and failure-free survival of patients. To conclude, Prof. Mohty mentions the importance of this trial and the REACH1 trial (NCT02953678) in providing insights into the future treatment of SR-aGvHD. This interview took place at the 48th Annual Meeting of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 2022, which was held virtually.

Transcript (edited for clarity)

Until recently, steroid-refractory acute GvHD has been really a nightmare when it comes to developing new drugs, and many trials have failed, unfortunately. The REACH2 trial actually was the first successful Phase III randomized trial in the field of steroid-refractory acute GvHD. This is a large trial. It has been already published, so you can see all the details in the paper. But the key message, if you look to the overall response rate at day 28, which is usually the endpoint that’s well accepted for this kind of study, actually there is a clear benefit for using ruxolitinib, which was tested in this REACH2 trial and randomized against the so-called best available therapy...

Until recently, steroid-refractory acute GvHD has been really a nightmare when it comes to developing new drugs, and many trials have failed, unfortunately. The REACH2 trial actually was the first successful Phase III randomized trial in the field of steroid-refractory acute GvHD. This is a large trial. It has been already published, so you can see all the details in the paper. But the key message, if you look to the overall response rate at day 28, which is usually the endpoint that’s well accepted for this kind of study, actually there is a clear benefit for using ruxolitinib, which was tested in this REACH2 trial and randomized against the so-called best available therapy. There was a clear superiority in favor of ruxolitinib compared to best available therapy whether you consider the response rate at day 28, but also at day 56 in terms of durability. But also, it is important to emphasize that the failure-free survival was because when it comes to transplant, you have to factor in different parameters, especially the problem of relapse. And actually, when it comes to failure-free survival, the results were also in favor of ruxolitinib. And this actually led, in addition to the results of the REACH1 trial which was before the REACH2 trial, to the approval by the FDA of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD. So I think this REACH2 trial has been a really important trial in the acute GvHD space.

Read more...