So, FS118 was a treatment for patients relapsed or refractory with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. And this treatment was investigated in a Phase II study, including 10 patients treated, especially in the context of relapsed post-CAR-T treatment. So the study was given for a population of patients relapsed refractory, at least two prior lines of treatment, and we included 10 patients in this cohort, and the result was presented at the ASH meeting...
So, FS118 was a treatment for patients relapsed or refractory with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. And this treatment was investigated in a Phase II study, including 10 patients treated, especially in the context of relapsed post-CAR-T treatment. So the study was given for a population of patients relapsed refractory, at least two prior lines of treatment, and we included 10 patients in this cohort, and the result was presented at the ASH meeting. We see that the variability of treatment was very fine. We do not see any significant elevated rates of immune-related adverse events. And interestingly, we see two patients with response to the treatment with ongoing response at the last cut-off date of the analysis. So it was 20% of response rate. So the population is very small. It’s difficult to say with a small proportion of patients, but we see activity for this population of patients, especially relapsed refractory post-CAR-T. There is no standard of care for this population of treatment and immune checkpoint inhibitor could be an option to be investigated for such patients because there is no today immune checkpoint in place for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and especially for relapsed refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.